ABSTRACT
Objective Statins are widely used drugs, known to cause myalgia, leading to high discontinuation rates. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of myalgia in patients on everyday-dose (EDD) regimen with those on alternate-day dose (ADD) regimen. Methods This cross sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital of Pakistan. A sample size of 400 patients between the age of 40–70 years, taking simvastatin 40 mg for at least 6 months or more were selected. Patients with prior musculoskeletal or neuromuscular complains, and family history of muscular disorders were excluded. Subjects were evaluated for myalgia via a self-administered questionnaire, and those complaining of myalgia were then evaluated for serum vitamin D levels. Data was analyzed through SPSS 16.0 and compared using chi square test. Results The overall prevalence of myalgia was 7% (28/400). Frequency of myalgia in patients taking simvastatin everyday (n = 20, 10%) was significantly higher compared to those taking it every alternate day (n = 8, 4%) (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the time of onset, nature, severity, type, or location of myalgia between the 2 groups. The most common cited triggering factor for pain was physical exercise. Of the patients experiencing myalgia, 13 (6.5%) from the EDD group and 6 (3%) from the ADD group had low levels of vitamin D. Conclusions ADD regime was better tolerated by the patients than EDD regime. Alternate day therapy, with or without vitamin D supplementation, may be used by the physicians for troublesome muscular complains.
ABSTRACT
Knowledge of variations in MF location, size and shape is important when anesthetizing nerves of the mandibular region in dental procedures. The location, shape and position of the MF were determined in 119 human mandibles of unknown age and sex from different KP medical institutions. Parameters determined were: MF length and width; accessory mental foramen (AMF) width; MF and AMF to midline (MF-ML) (AMF-ML), upper (MF-UM) (AMF-UM) and lower mandibular margins (MF-LM) (AMF-LM) and posterior border of the mandibular ramus (MF-PRM) (AMF-PRM). AMF position in relation to the MF was also noted. MF were mainly oval and situated below the second premolar. MF mean length and width were: 2.4 ± 0.89 (right) and 2.4 ± 0.727 mm (left), and 3.0 ± 0.80 (right) and 2.9 ± 0.94 mm (left) respectively. MF-ML, MF-UM, MF-LM and MF-PRM distances on the right and left sides were: 29.1 ± 2.19 mm and 28.1 ± 2.12 mm; 11.0 ± 3.99 mm and 11.2 ± 3.98 mm; 13.1 ± 1.83 mm and 12.8 ± 1.74 mm; and 69.3 ± 5.52 mm and 68.7 ± 5.02 mm, respectively. Double mental foramen (DMF) were observed on both sides (10.9 % right, 12.6 % left) with length and width 0.7 ± 0.42 mm and 0.9 ± 0.34 mm (right) and 0.8 ± 0.32 mm and 1.0 ± 0.47 mm (left): they were mainly oval (5.8 % right, 7.56 % left). DMF-MF distance was 8.9 ± 4.58 mm on the right and 6.6 ± 4.11 mm on the left. An oval accessory mental foramen was observed in one mandible. There was no difference between right and left MF; however differences in the parameters measured were observed in relation to other populations indicating the need to be aware of such differences when undertaking surgical procedures around the MF.
El conocimiento de las variaciones del foramen mental (FM), su ubicación, tamaño y forma es importante al momento de anestesiar los nervios de la región mandibular en procedimientos dentales. La ubicación, forma y posición del FM se determinó en 119 mandíbulas humanas, de edad y sexo desconocidos, de diferentes instituciones médicas de Pakistan. Los parámetros determinados fueron: longitud y ancho; ancho del foramen mental accesorio (FMA); MF y AMF a la línea mediana (FM-LM) (FMA-LM), margen superior (FM-MS) (FMA-MU) y margen inferior (FM-MI) (FMA-MI) y el margen posterior de la rama mandibular (FM-RMP) (FMA-RMP). También se observó la posición del FMA en relación con el FM. La forma del FM fue principalmente ovalada y situado por debajo del segundo premolar. Los datos de longitud y anchura del FM fueron: 2,4 ± 0,89 (derecha) y 2,4 ± 0,727 mm (izquierda), y 3,0 ± 0,80 (derecha) y 2,9 ± 0,94 mm (izquierda), respectivamente. Las distancias FM-LM, FM-MS, FM-MI y FM-MRP en el lado derecho e izquierdo fueron: 29,1 ± 2,19 mm y 28,1 ± 2,12 mm; 11.0 ± 3.99 mm y 11,2 ± 3,98 mm; 13,1 ± 1,83 mm y 12,8 ± 1,74 mm; y 69,3 ± 5,52 mm y 68,7 ± 5,02 mm, respectivamente. Se observaron foramenes mentales dobles (FMD) en ambos lados (10,9 % derecho, 12,6 % a la izquierda) con una longitud y ancho de 0,7 ± 0,42 mm y 0,9 ± 0,34 mm (derecha) y 0,8 ± 0,32 mm y 1,0 ± 0,47 mm (izquierda): fueron principalmente ovalados (5,8 % derecha, izquierda 7,56 %). La distancia FMD-FM fue de 8,9 ± 4,58 mm a la derecha y 6,6 ± 4,11 mm en el izquierdo. Se observó un foramen mental accesorio ovalado en una mandíbula. Hubo diferencia entre FM derecho e izquierdo. Sin embargo, las diferencias en los parámetros medidos fueron observados en relación con otras poblaciones que indican la necesidad de ser conscientes de estas diferencias al realizar procedimientos quirúrgicos en todo el MF.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anatomic Variation , Mandible/abnormalities , Mandible/anatomy & histology , PakistanABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if a correlation exists between the effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and the extraction fraction (EF) using 99mTc MAG3 in children. This EF has been previously described with 9mTc DTPA. However, the renal imaging agent of choice has become 9mTc MAG3. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study was approved by The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's institutional review board. Informed consent was also obtained A retrospective study of 29 children (16 males, 13 females) of ages 1 month to 19.5 years who underwent 99mTc MAG3 renal scintigraphy from September 2001 to December 2001 was analysed. EF values were calculated with and without attenuation correction in each kidney by determining the counts in a region of interest, correcting for background and comparing the counts with the injected dose. The EF was compared to the ERPF calculated using the Schlegel's method. The correlation between the EF and the ERPF corrected and non-corrected for soft tissue attenuation, were determined and were identified by using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: There was significant correlation between the ERPF and the EF with (r = 0.62, p < 0.05 on the left, r = 0.51, p = 0.005 on the right) than without attenuation correction (r = 0.54, p = 0.003 on the left, r = 0.42, p = 0.022 on the right). CONCLUSION: These results indicate a correlation of the ERPF calculated using the Schlegel's method with EF obtained from a 99mTc MAG3 renal scintigraphy. The EF may be the good alternative parameter for calculation of renal function, potentially more practical in pediatric patient and the ERPF for 99mTc MAG3 using the established software program based on Schlegel's formula.